10
сен
The rumor thats going around is the lube they used on the threads before assembly. The story is they lubed the threads on friday and assembled them on monday so its said. I'm guessing they should of assembled them at the sametime the lube was put on them. I think they followed the wrong process.
So far i think the number of guns is around 30 but i'll check it again. I just hope that no one gets hurt or even worse. I love my redhawks and thought they were the tops in 44mags.
The right side of the frame is marked “RUGER Redhawk” and with the company logo. The serial number is on the butt of the grip frame. The face of the cylinder is marked 'S'.
I just hope this is just one little bump that we can get over with just a few having problems. Not wise to put out a warning before you actually know what happened. I have been shooting Ruger's Redhawk's for almost long as they have been out, Bought my first one in the early 1980's.
Never had a problem with any of the 7 I have owned.Whats wrong with putting out a warning with a video to back it up? I'm saying is to use caution to besafe. Gun safety never sleeps or takes a vacation we need to be well imformed about all guns and that they may have a problem that could happen to anyone of us. I believe there are around 30 of these that have seperated there frames from the barrels does that sound better?
I love my redhawks too but if i'm in any danger i would like to know about it wouldn't you too? Not wise to put out a warning before you actually know what happened. I have been shooting Ruger's Redhawk's for almost long as they have been out, Bought my first one in the early 1980's. Never had a problem with any of the 7 I have owned. Barrel separation problems with Redhawks made in the mid-eighties is a well known fact. Even Ruger themselves admitted there was a problem.
The Super Redhawk was designed to replace the Redhawk because Ruger could not figure out what the problem was. This is why the Super Redhawk is so much beefier in the frame where the barrel attaches. The Redhawk was to be discontinued once the Super Redhawk was introduced. Turned out it was the lube they were using during assembly allowed the barrel to be over-torqued. Since the problem was an assembly and not a design flaw, and the solution was simple, Ruger continued production on the Redhawk, even after the introduction of the Super Redhawk. You would think that Ruger must know the serial numbers of the affected revolvers and would have had a recall on them.
If they knew about it since then they should of recalled them before someone gets hurt or killed. Its not safe to shoot along side someone with a redhawk i would think. We just never know if some of the barrel parts will go to either side too. I guess i'll be getting an S&W 29 in 44mag soon too. I think my 3 redhawks will be leaving the armory now soon. I may get another ruger super blackhawk to have a 44mag to hammer on. Mickey mouse free games download. I really love my redhawks too.
Bill BTW; Now that i hear this they probably over tightened the barrel during the assembly and started the crack in the thread area. Armed with this knowledge ruger is sitting on a powder keg if someone gets hurt sooner or later. There better off recalling them or buying them back to avoid a class action law suit right? They should give us the serial numbers of these bad redhawks to possibly save someones life.
The snake in the wood pile sounds like its ruger itself. Ruger did tell one guy who had a flying barrel from his redhawk that they don't have a problem with the redhawks. I believe there are around 30 barrels now that have left the frames.
Popular Posts
The rumor thats going around is the lube they used on the threads before assembly. The story is they lubed the threads on friday and assembled them on monday so its said. I\'m guessing they should of assembled them at the sametime the lube was put on them. I think they followed the wrong process.
So far i think the number of guns is around 30 but i\'ll check it again. I just hope that no one gets hurt or even worse. I love my redhawks and thought they were the tops in 44mags.
The right side of the frame is marked “RUGER Redhawk” and with the company logo. The serial number is on the butt of the grip frame. The face of the cylinder is marked \'S'.
I just hope this is just one little bump that we can get over with just a few having problems. Not wise to put out a warning before you actually know what happened. I have been shooting Ruger\'s Redhawk\'s for almost long as they have been out, Bought my first one in the early 1980\'s.
Never had a problem with any of the 7 I have owned.Whats wrong with putting out a warning with a video to back it up? I\'m saying is to use caution to besafe. Gun safety never sleeps or takes a vacation we need to be well imformed about all guns and that they may have a problem that could happen to anyone of us. I believe there are around 30 of these that have seperated there frames from the barrels does that sound better?
I love my redhawks too but if i\'m in any danger i would like to know about it wouldn\'t you too? Not wise to put out a warning before you actually know what happened. I have been shooting Ruger\'s Redhawk\'s for almost long as they have been out, Bought my first one in the early 1980\'s. Never had a problem with any of the 7 I have owned. Barrel separation problems with Redhawks made in the mid-eighties is a well known fact. Even Ruger themselves admitted there was a problem.
The Super Redhawk was designed to replace the Redhawk because Ruger could not figure out what the problem was. This is why the Super Redhawk is so much beefier in the frame where the barrel attaches. The Redhawk was to be discontinued once the Super Redhawk was introduced. Turned out it was the lube they were using during assembly allowed the barrel to be over-torqued. Since the problem was an assembly and not a design flaw, and the solution was simple, Ruger continued production on the Redhawk, even after the introduction of the Super Redhawk. You would think that Ruger must know the serial numbers of the affected revolvers and would have had a recall on them.
If they knew about it since then they should of recalled them before someone gets hurt or killed. Its not safe to shoot along side someone with a redhawk i would think. We just never know if some of the barrel parts will go to either side too. I guess i\'ll be getting an S&W 29 in 44mag soon too. I think my 3 redhawks will be leaving the armory now soon. I may get another ruger super blackhawk to have a 44mag to hammer on. Mickey mouse free games download. I really love my redhawks too.
Bill BTW; Now that i hear this they probably over tightened the barrel during the assembly and started the crack in the thread area. Armed with this knowledge ruger is sitting on a powder keg if someone gets hurt sooner or later. There better off recalling them or buying them back to avoid a class action law suit right? They should give us the serial numbers of these bad redhawks to possibly save someones life.
The snake in the wood pile sounds like its ruger itself. Ruger did tell one guy who had a flying barrel from his redhawk that they don\'t have a problem with the redhawks. I believe there are around 30 barrels now that have left the frames.
...'>Ruger Redhawk Serial Numbers(10.09.2018)The rumor thats going around is the lube they used on the threads before assembly. The story is they lubed the threads on friday and assembled them on monday so its said. I\'m guessing they should of assembled them at the sametime the lube was put on them. I think they followed the wrong process.
So far i think the number of guns is around 30 but i\'ll check it again. I just hope that no one gets hurt or even worse. I love my redhawks and thought they were the tops in 44mags.
The right side of the frame is marked “RUGER Redhawk” and with the company logo. The serial number is on the butt of the grip frame. The face of the cylinder is marked \'S'.
I just hope this is just one little bump that we can get over with just a few having problems. Not wise to put out a warning before you actually know what happened. I have been shooting Ruger\'s Redhawk\'s for almost long as they have been out, Bought my first one in the early 1980\'s.
Never had a problem with any of the 7 I have owned.Whats wrong with putting out a warning with a video to back it up? I\'m saying is to use caution to besafe. Gun safety never sleeps or takes a vacation we need to be well imformed about all guns and that they may have a problem that could happen to anyone of us. I believe there are around 30 of these that have seperated there frames from the barrels does that sound better?
I love my redhawks too but if i\'m in any danger i would like to know about it wouldn\'t you too? Not wise to put out a warning before you actually know what happened. I have been shooting Ruger\'s Redhawk\'s for almost long as they have been out, Bought my first one in the early 1980\'s. Never had a problem with any of the 7 I have owned. Barrel separation problems with Redhawks made in the mid-eighties is a well known fact. Even Ruger themselves admitted there was a problem.
The Super Redhawk was designed to replace the Redhawk because Ruger could not figure out what the problem was. This is why the Super Redhawk is so much beefier in the frame where the barrel attaches. The Redhawk was to be discontinued once the Super Redhawk was introduced. Turned out it was the lube they were using during assembly allowed the barrel to be over-torqued. Since the problem was an assembly and not a design flaw, and the solution was simple, Ruger continued production on the Redhawk, even after the introduction of the Super Redhawk. You would think that Ruger must know the serial numbers of the affected revolvers and would have had a recall on them.
If they knew about it since then they should of recalled them before someone gets hurt or killed. Its not safe to shoot along side someone with a redhawk i would think. We just never know if some of the barrel parts will go to either side too. I guess i\'ll be getting an S&W 29 in 44mag soon too. I think my 3 redhawks will be leaving the armory now soon. I may get another ruger super blackhawk to have a 44mag to hammer on. Mickey mouse free games download. I really love my redhawks too.
Bill BTW; Now that i hear this they probably over tightened the barrel during the assembly and started the crack in the thread area. Armed with this knowledge ruger is sitting on a powder keg if someone gets hurt sooner or later. There better off recalling them or buying them back to avoid a class action law suit right? They should give us the serial numbers of these bad redhawks to possibly save someones life.
The snake in the wood pile sounds like its ruger itself. Ruger did tell one guy who had a flying barrel from his redhawk that they don\'t have a problem with the redhawks. I believe there are around 30 barrels now that have left the frames.
...'>Ruger Redhawk Serial Numbers(10.09.2018)